Oh wauw I see indeed @Swang007, that is very interesting why I don’t get those charts but that is another issue… Thanks man!
So does it actually have an ILS or not? We have conflicting data so I’m not sure.
No idea, is airnav trustful?
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Flight ware has the same data and since @Aernout chart it dated July 2014 and these two are dated August-September 2015 I do believe it has an ILS Approach and yes the heading for both is 284
Yup, he fixed it.
Thanks Henrik, both of the 28’s right?
28L is 3 degrees off and 28R is 13
That’s right. :)
Kicking a not-so-dead horse, the 28R and 28L are still off for using APPR, an FYI more than a complaint.
Also, 19L and 19R has me bury my nose gear in the ground, but not crash.
Use APPR on 737BBJ and is a fun challange to land, as controlling throttle is a skill (throttle and trim to land), especially in Solo setting to night and Wx to low visibility with adverse winds. Landing Aids (red rectangles) turned o0ff.
P.S.
PHNL -Honolulu 26L is way off to the right by about 2 miles :)
KSFO is known for 28 L/R. APPR shouldn’t be used on a GPS approach such as the 19s or 26 at PHNL.
26L PHNL is ILS.
KSFO 19L is ILS, 19R GPS
Previous post seems to suggest 28R/L being fixed.
P.S. I use APPR on GPS approaches frequently and they work generally. Just have to watch for terrain.
Possibly will have improved with global as the whole airport has been redone and the ILS too.
Works for me, but admittedly flares late. I’ll check it out.
It’s an LDA and is meant to be like that, they aren’t properly supported in IF
@Richard_Barrett 19L will be fixed with global, so will the 28’s hopefully, 26L at PHNL is correct
Thank you for the detailed update !
We can officially confirm that the 28 ILSs are working properly now :)