Manchester very well could have been implemented in the UK region early in development. I kind of wonder why they didn’t take that chance. I guess now it doesn’t matter since we’re getting Global but it does raise question.
If they had moved the region slightly northwest, it would fit.
I don’t know…but sure it will be included in global flight soon!
I always thought it was a shame they did not put Manchester airport in the region when you consider the size and the number of movements it has. But yes when we get global better late than never. R
Look at the left corner up…
On the top left of the picture ;)
I wish there was Manchester :( it’s my favourite airport
It’s not the UK region though, it’s the London region ;-)
True, UK would be England, Northern Irealnd, Soctoland, etc
And Wales too…
I call it UK because it has Birmingham. Then again, it would be more proper to say England. So England region.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
I agree because there is quite a big distant between Birmingham and London and it is a equal distance from Bristol so it would have made sense to have added a few more like Bristol and perhaps other ones within a similar distance but with global flight hopefully we get more of the airport we love
It’s good to discuss all these things now because there won’t be any boundaries soon! (Except going to space, right @AR_AR?) Sorry for going a little off topic :-)
This topic was automatically closed 90 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.