I have been watching IFATC for a long time, especially when they come to Brazil. They don’t even study the procedures and peculiarities of each airport before starting an ATC session at that airport. Thus bringing a wave of errors and complications.
A few months ago I saw an IFATC in session at Santos Dumont (SBRJ). Promoting parallel landings as if it were San Francisco (KSFO), the IFATC did not even pay attention to what type of airfield it was controlling. That same, accepted planes whose operation is not allowed by the runway limits and taxiways. What decadence!
The last time we saw Guarulhos (SBGR) on the IFATC calendar, I saw parallel landings on both the 9th and the 27th, which is not the case in reality. I suggest to IFATC teachers or tutors that they encourage the practice of aerodrome study before they hold any session.
Second point I would like to add is to the other friends and pilots … I know that they love to use their favorite companies and favorite airplanes, but I strongly urge you to follow the companies that are suggested in the IFATC calendar. If you want a dash of realism, let’s do it straight.
Big hug to all