You’re definitely right, but what I think we meant is that the rate of pitch-up is excessive in the a320 family in-game. Even when modulating the back pressure that we input during rotation, it’s very difficult to manage a proper takeoff in the a320s, but in other airbus aircraft it is very much manageable.
Another question guys is the reverse thrust
How’s a idle reverse done on infinite flight because sometimes you don’t need to use full reverse due to how long the runway is for example Denver runway 35l I see on flight Radar a380 pilots use the full runway but on infinite flight due to using the full reverser you get slowed down immediately any realistic procedure for this thanks
Well, I’ve done it so many times that I’ve gotten used to using either 50 or 70% reverse thrust without trying too hard. Basically the reverse thrust is a slider just like the throttle, but with a very short slide range, meaning very little movement makes for a lot more reverse thrust change. But some practice and patience will help you get it down eventually. Because I do agree, using full reverse thrust is very rare, especially for airliners
2 Likes
When I use reverse thrust (still haven’t gotten used to how short it is compared to the forward thrust) I often slam it all the way to full reverse for two seconds then I drop it to 70-85 percent once I remember that the reverse thrust climbs faster in the numbers than forward does….
1 Like
Im literally pitching my phone so lightly its barely noticable and it still does it.
You aint gotta be so condescending good lord.
Hang on, calm down. I don’t believe he was being condescending. Text carries zero tone, and while you most certainly could read it as such, it also could just as well be otherwise. In this case, I think he’s pointing out something interesting. As to what you just posted, try having a lower sensitivity. I personally keep my sensitivity on low at all times, barring a few odd circumstances. This has helped me tremendously with my efforts toward realism.
Back at the original issue of this thread, @Derrick778, have you been able to get some smoother takeoffs? If you want, let me know which aircraft you’re struggling with and I’ll see if I can replicate your scenario myself, and get a smooth takeoff. In your case too, lowering your sensitivity in the general settings might help your liftoff performance
1 Like
Ive done that aswel. Ive taken into account any and all options, on my momma 
It aint that big a deal for me really
And im calm so idk why that was mentioned.
1 Like
Darn, I was hoping that would be an easy fix. Which aircraft specifically, and if you have the weight, wind, and runway/airport I can try to replicate what you’re speaking of
Eh its not that big a deal for me really i dont mind. Adds to the challenge and frankly i dont fly the A320’s enough
1 Like
A320 takeoff characteristics plus 747 takeoff characteristics divided by two = pretty darn good takeoff characteristics
2 Likes
How is this condescending?:
1 Like
Hey man what influences the decision to use flaps 1f or two for take of on airbus
1 Like
Your capability to take or maintain flight based on your Airbus’ power settings, which we don’t have in IF. So treat it the same way you would a Boeing or a Cessna based on these usual basic factors:
- Weight and Speed. Ya just need more wings to fly this thing, whether to get that extra umph during take-off or even mid-flight at lower speeds or when you’re gonna land it..
- Altitude. The higher you are, the thinner the air. More wings. Also applies upon landing.
- Runway Length. Afraid you’re not gonna be able to make it before runway runs out? More wings.
In detail, for an Airbus, the professional and technical decision to chose either Flaps 1, 1+F or flaps 2 for Infinite Flight use can be made using the following table as such (I’ll give you example for an A380):
This is very true, we dont need 100% N1 for takeoff lol
Is that a good thing or just you being sarcastic?
Cause I can’t tell…….