It’s been asked time and time again.
But this time, I’d like to ask the same question - from a different angle.
As far as I am aware, and in layman’s terms,Airbusesstop pilots from doing things that the aircraft considers to be wrong and can override a pilot’s decision (i.e. low airspeed, over-banking etc.). Whereas Boeings would advise a pilot of such a situation, but would require a pilot’s action and their decision.
But computers can, and do, go wrong.
A pilot may be stopped from doing what is best for the aircraft, or it may prevent them from getting something wrong.
So I have two questions.
As a PASSENGER, which manufacturer’s aircraft would you feel safer on, with this knowledge?
Airbus
Boeing
0voters
And, as a PILOT, which manufacturer’s aircraft would you rather fly, with this knowledge?
@Swang007 As far as I am aware, there is limited overriding. I think there was some debate over this about the Hudson crash, I’ll see if I can find it for you.
With this poll I am only considering the benefits and pitfalls of Boeing and Airbus technology in the cockpit.
I have very limited knowledge about McDonnell Douglas.
It’s fine. To answer your question though, I have no preference. The computer of the A320 makes me feel comfortable, but the failure of the computer is something that will happen someday unfortunately (Nothing is oerfect).
That said, even though a Boeing notifies you about the issue, the pilot could make poor judgement in the heat of the moment and doom everyone.
I would prefer Boeing because if you have a auto pilot engaged and are not aware of it the actual yolk of the plane will move. Where as Airbus even if an auto pilot is engaged unknowingly the side stick will not move. Less situational awareness more upsets.