Guys, I’m not here to persuade people voting for which ac. Everyone got their vote, we all have the rights to speak out and contribute to our beloved community, aren’t we?
So after reading bunch of arguments from both sides regarding the vote, I just want to express my views towards the ones who just blindly copying others’ words and made the comment session into a mess or similarly to a war at the dinner table. (the point is that ppl don’t have actual evidence to support their argument and just bxxlsxixxxx)
Views on part of the 220 supporters
Stop saying the 220 offers an enhanced regional experience when comparing to the 333 :) It’s enough. Expand your data base pls!
I do understand that A220 is gonna play an important role in regional flights, & I do notice a bunch of ppl just simply argue 333 won’t enhance their domestic experience in IF so they argue 333 shouldn’t be chosen. In fact, our IFC not only combines AVgeeks from EU & AM but also Asia, Oceania, Africa.
TBH, if you’re focusing on enhanced experience in regional flights, 330 does the same work as 220. Take Asia again as an example, many 330s have been flown between cities & metropolis in Asia for decades. Though it’s a rare scene for a widebody to fly regional or even domestic flight, its a daily routine in Asia. Cathay & Dragonair serve their flight to Guangzhou/Xiamen/Kaosiung daily, these flights take only about an hour or even less but theres still no. of flights operating on a daily basis w 333s. Singapore has been flying their 359 to Kuala Lumpur. JAL & ANA used to fly their 744D on their domestic routes, and now they swapped to 773s & 359. The Jumbos had been serving Osaka Itami & Heneda for years before. Widebodies do regional flights & its a common scene in several continents!
Hence, the busiest route before covid was HKG-TPE and there’s a flight every 15 mins, however, more than 90% of them are served by widebodies, 77W, 359. 333, 78X, you name it, the flight just take less than 90mins! As a result, if you’re saying that regional routes are not for the 330, you’re wrong, you’re just focusing in EU & AM, but not in a global context.
Views on part of the 330 supporters
Yeah, I know, you want to say 220 has few operators and therefore 333 should go first? It’s not convincing at all!
Little operators, so what? You can’t just simply tell others to support your view by such kind of ARGUMENT. Come on :(
Everyone have their beloved livery, you see Air-Baltic fans? They’ve been waited for ages for their beloved carrier to have another ac added to IF, you can’t just persuade people to support your own preference by such a subjective views!
The raptors just have one single livery, wouldn’t you tell our devs to delete it?! Guys…
No matter which ac you’re going to persuade our IFC fellows to vote. Just don’t take regional experiences or less variety of choices as reasons. This is not persuasive at all & even your argument doesn’t stand!
Broaden your horizons, expand your knowledge, discover more things about aviation, the thing you love the most (besides family), familiarize yourself with a broader range of conceptions! Be a rational person!
Anyway, enjoy your flight in IF. Safe landings, cheers. Let’s make our discussion a more constructive one :)