Because in real life the A318 is the biggest plane that can land there, why not put a restriction on it so no aircraft bigger than the A318 can land for realism purposes like at KASE.
I agree adds more realism to the sim
But not only on london
He means EGLC, as in London City Airport.
Make a restriction for “supers” (a380;747…) at KNUC >:(
Well if you put one at EGLC then someone will want a TFR somewhere else in the London region. Then someone will want another TFR in the London region, and before long the map will be filled.
Is that necessarily a bad thing? As long as it’s realistic, I just can’t see how it would be bad.
This will be a challenge unless the TFR is very small as Heathrow is right next to it
True to that, like Airspace it has to be small and have a lower ceiling because it’s right in the way of Britain’s busiest airport.
I suppose it’s not bad, but if they add a ton of TFR’s at least make them smaller. The ones at Aspen and Eagle County are huge in my opinion.
I think E-195s are larger than A318, correct me if I’m wrong. They still fly to London City.
Expert ATC should have the ability to add restrictions, do I think.
We shouldn’t get carried away with TFRs to do this.
It wouldn’t look the best on maps, with so many red circles that on can barely see your flightplan.
If this happens, a restriction should be put for all required Airports which is impossible…
Therefore London city gets no special treatment.
Maybe only for LCY, as it is very busy in IF. Other random class Delta airports can stay the way they are now.
good idea its wierd to see an 737-900 there
This, a lot.
Common sense > TFR’s.
Make LCY realistic again
It never was.