Please further strengthen the conditions for achieving the grade 3

1

I was approaching runway 36L at Beijing International Airport and informed other aircraft of my position. However, I saw another aircraft approaching runway 18R. I called out my location again, stating that I was on final approach to 36L, but they still continued their approach to 18R. At that time, Beijing Airport was using runway 36R, and other aircraft were landing there. Despite the active runway being 36R and 36L, they proceeded with their approach, nearly causing a collision.

IMG_0235
IMG_02352420×1668 694 KB

IMG_0236
IMG_02361210×834 1.02 MB

IMG_0237
IMG_02372420×1668 3.34 MB

IMG_0238
IMG_02382420×1668 3.52 MB

IMG_0233
IMG_02332420×1668 722 KB

The problems with this player are, first, they don’t let other aircraft know their intentions. Second, unstable approach and sub-ideal approach speed. Please, these plays should reinforce the requirements for professional server play to prevent professional servers from playing. Why is the professional server separated from the casual server and the training server? Otherwise, it will hurt other players who are seeking to fly

The player name is 2571386841

2

When there are no staffed IFATCs, usage of the “correct” runway can be tricky. A ‘green’ runway doesn’t necessarily mean the runway is in use. This also applies to orange/red, etc.

However, I do agree that pilots should communicate using unicom, whatever their intentions may be. But again, there’s no real rule against not using unicom

3 Likes