May 2025 Appeals Data: Reflect, Learn, Improve


:bullseye: Appeals Data – May 2025 :bar_chart::airplane:

Ensuring Fairness, and Continuous Improvement


Welcome to our monthly appeals data! In May 2025, the appeals team continued its dedication to ensuring fair process. this data goes to beyond just numbers; it’s a reflection of our commitment to continuous learning and adaptation. Remember, every appeal filed is an opportunity to gain deeper insight and enchance the quality of our services.

This report is drawn exclusively from cases where pilots reached out to our Appeals Team, moderators, or staff. Non-appealed violations aren’t reflected here. All data is anonymized and provided solely for educational purposes.

:police_car_light: Pro Tip: Violations happen fast stay focused, follow ATC, and keep your replay saved!


πŸ“Š Appeals Stats – At a Glance
  • Total Appeals submitted: 209 :envelope_with_arrow:
  • Approved Appeals: 79 :white_check_mark: (37,79%)
  • Denied Appeals: 130 :cross_mark: (62,20%)

Most of successful appeals had clear technical proof (e.g., replay evidence).

Please Note: Appeals are reviewed case by case, ensuring fairness while upholding community standards.


πŸ“Œ Dive into the Details: Violation Breakdown πŸ“‹

Below is a detailed table of appeals categorized by violation type. For each category, we note the number of appeals, common reasons, and associated documentation requirements.

Documented Appeals by Category


Violation Category Reversal / Approved Denied / Uphold Total Appeals
:prohibited: Not Following Instructions 25 34 59
:straight_ruler:Not following ATC assigned heading, altitude, or speed 20 35 55
:airplane:Failure to Maintain Separation 1 7 8
Taxiing Through Others 6 3 9
Unresponsive while climbing, descending or manuvering 3 7 5
Aligned with the wrong runaway 2 6 8
Excessive Speed 2 2
Taxi without Permission 3 4 7
Failure To Complete Instrument Approach 4 9 13
:stop_sign: Entering RWY w/o Permission 6 14 20
Failure to Divert 1 2 2
Crossing RWY w/o permission 3 2 5
Other 3 3 6

:police_car_light: Most denied appeals were due to pilot errors, lack of replay evidence, or clear violations.

Other Documentations


Additional comments and outcomes related to specific appeals during this period:

Remarks Quantity
No Response from Pilot 31
Network Issues 28
Controller Requested Removal 3
Simple Pilot Error 34
Deleted Replays 20
Controller Error 19
One Time Courtesy 36

:warning: Pro Tip: If you delete your replay, you LOSE your chance to appeal! Always keep a copy! :movie_camera:


:books: Flight Deck Library – Resources & Guides

Useful reads to stay informed:

These resources explain the rules in detail. For instance, appeals must include replay evidence (Level 1 violations can’t be appealed unless evidence of technical issue) Review them to avoid surprises!

:hammer_and_wrench: Take control of your learning and become a better pilot!


Thank you for taking the time to review our May 2025 Appeals Data. Your insights help us refine processes and improve service quality for everyone. We look forward to your thoughts!

Infinite Flight Appeals Team


11 Likes

It’s that time of the month again! Insightful and interesting as always.

insert mega sigh meme here

5 Likes

I think you meant 37.79% of appeals got approved while 62.20% were denied :wink:

Good data as always :raising_hands:

1 Like

Oh my will chance it

I have so much time for this!

Even for a blatant vio, a good attitude from the pilot and clear learning taking place should definitely result in their return to the Expert Server!

Great job Appeals team :heart:

5 Likes

Fantastic information as always. Thank you for compiling & sharing!

1 Like