Lax craving satisfied 
If I do head on shots, maybe they’ll look less backlit.
— Butter 575
you should really look into a super telephoto lol
Insert generic comment praising photos.
Insert reply mocking generic comment and/or chant chain between IFC members
“Nice shot nice shot nice shot”
Nice shots butter
Oh if it were night time
Butter cooking as butter does 
I’m pretty sure they were backlit but you do you 
jk jk great pics!
My bone craving was also satisfied today 
The planes were heading towards the sun, so it couldn’t possibly be backlit
I’ll wait for a little bit
(180-600 is $1900)
Insert NPCs (jk)
Thanks thanks thanks.
Thank you!
If it were night time then it couldn’t possibly be backlit
Thank you!
There is a pretty decent 150-500Z Tamron for like half that if you’re interested in third party. Not the best lens ever with some key weaknesses but $1000 for 500mm and no adaptor isn’t the worst deal.
I haven’t looked much at lenses (mainly because I’m not interested in buying one rn) and just did a quick search when you mentioned it lol. Might consider a third party if it is half the price
Whats your setup?
@Darkspoul has the lens on his Z5 so you can ask him about it
70-200 on a Z7 I think. Very high end setup but you’re playing catch up for this type of photo with that little reach.
Only 200mm?! @Butter575, invest in at least a 300mm. It shouldn’t cost you more than $500 or $600. When I get my Z6, I’m going to get a 150-500mm, because otherwise you’re just extremely limited.
So shiny
Do you know the registration?
Also nice pics sir
Don’t go third party lenses on Nikon (when I mean 3rd party I mean don’t adapt different mounts into a z mount camera it won’t go well) I’d stick with a direct z mount lens if I were you
Shhhh the IFC doesn’t know about that yet 