I have created a topic so that if anyone is stuck on creating a fpl they can use the ones on here for help. With global I hope to add more flightplans
#Socal
KLAX-KSAN
KPSP-KSAN
KSAN-KPSP
#Singapore
WSSS-WMKK
WMKK-WMBT
#Amsterdam
EHAM-EDDL
EDDL-EBBR
#Hawaii
PHNL-PHTO
PHNL-PHKO
PHTO-PHOG
#Carribean
TNCM-TFFR
Shorter Route
TNCM-TAPA
#London
EGLL-EGBB
EGLL-EGNX
EGKK-EGBB
#New York
KJFK-KWRI
KPOU-KWRI
#Austrailia
YSSY-YSCB
YSCB-YSRI
#Denver
#Paris
#Chicago
#Charlotte
#Seattle
KSEA-KPDX
KOLM-KPDX
#South Florida
KMIA-KTPA
KMIA-KSRQ
KMIA-KFLL
More to come.
If your not a regular and want to post a fpl that isn’t already on here place it in the comments below
26 Likes
I like the idea of a sort of “dispatch” thread. Looks good :)
1 Like
Thanks guys I’m trying to add more as I collect more fpl’s
This thread will get very interesting once global comes out. The flight plans will be endless.
1 Like
I’ll try to keep them as organised as possible regulars should get the idea of the format etc add the ICAO codes with the image of the map + fpl and add it to a section
1 Like
This is an excellent idea. Thanks for posting!
1 Like
Guys I don’t have the Paris or Denver scenery so if anyone has flightplans for them add a section for Paris and Denver please
zbelle
October 1, 2016, 8:34pm
9
I hope that you’re taking ground elevation into account when making these flight plans, I saw a couple of those that are a little bit on the sketchy side unless you’re a fan of fast climbs.
Particularly KPSP-KSAN, and PHTO-PHOG
3 Likes
KPSP-KSAN follows the mountains not straight over them
And PHTO-PHOG cuts through the middle of the two mountains
1 Like
zbelle
October 1, 2016, 8:37pm
12
Right, I was talking about your crossover point after initial climbout. I’ll give these a try later for sure PHTO-PHOG requires a pretty decent positive VS.
1 Like
PHSF is at a height of 6188ft the ascent from PHTO through PHSF can reach 6188ft with a vs of 3000fpm right here
3 Likes
zbelle
October 1, 2016, 9:36pm
14
That’s about what I was calculating. 🙂
hmkane
October 1, 2016, 9:47pm
15
I like it, just remember to maybe stay on airways in future flight plans for the added realism.
1 Like
zbelle
October 1, 2016, 10:20pm
16
Isn’t this why we have the ability to make our own flight plans instead of being forced onto existing or standard ones?
1 Like
hmkane
October 1, 2016, 10:33pm
17
I wasn’t really forcing. Just suggesting. If you don’t want to use airways don’t. I was just saying for the added realism for these. I’m sorry you didn’t like my suggestion.
1 Like
Nice!
1 Like
If anyone is looking for a realistic flight planner, www.simroutes.com is a great website.
I try my best to keep them on airways and VOR’s but sometimes that is really difficult to do
