Earlier I spotted an aircraft flying near me on the expert server while I was cruising. Out of curiosity, I tapped the plane, to find out where it was going, however I noticed a way point on the pilots flight plan called ‘Track Z’
I’m not sure what this is, could someone explain to me ?
That is the North Atlantic Track Z, or track Z / NATZ for short.
NAT’s are routings across the north atlantic ocean that are updated daily, to facilitate aircraft flying “across the pond” with the most favorable winds on their journey. This also makes it easy for ATC to seperate using either longitudinal, latitudinal seperation (but that’s advanced).
Despite being updated daily, they share the same lettering. Westbound NAT tracks start with the letter A and forward, and eastbound tracks start with the letter Z and go backwards.
To see the current NAT tracks, go to this website. :)
If you’ve got any more questions about NAT tracks, or oceanic procedures tag and ask me!
That’s interesting. I wasn’t aware that NAT tracks are in IF yet, though I think there was a small reference to it on twitter by Laura or the official IF twitter of it possibly being in development.
As Leron said, I didn’t know NAT’s were implemented yet.
However, implementing them now does not make much sense, as they are phasing out the NAT system now. ADS-B and ADS-C is so precise, that they are not needed anymore.
If you scroll down to the bottom of the article I have linked below, it does talk about ADS-B and ADS-C becoming mandatory on A/C, however I’m not too familiar with the topic so I’m not fully sure what it means and if NAT is being phased out.
The end is not confirmed, but it will happen as ADS-B gets more precise and ADS-C is implemented broadly.
The OTS (Organized Track Structure) which creates the NAT Tracks relies on position reports due to the lack of radar coverage across the ocean, creating a virtual ~60nm (1 degree of latitude) spacing for each aircraft. Due to the increase in traffic, that is just not efficient enough. However with sattelite and IRIDIUM-based ADS-B recievers, that’s no longer a problem.
@Leron_Gundlur What you’re describing there is something related called RLAT/RLatSM, which makes ADS-B and CPDLC mandatory. That, and a trial system called OWAFS is a part of the transition to the free routing system.
NATS has a target deadline of 2025 to get rid of the NAT-OTS system and transition to the free routing ideal. :)