I would open this up as a complaint, but as complaints don’t get worked on let alone looked at (my complaint wasn’t replied to or aknowladged even after pinging multiple staff members), so I’ll just call it an argument.
Let me walk you through a quick scenario. An ice cream shop has seven flavors. Recently, a customer noticed the lack of a classic flavor, vanilla, which is nearly essential to every ice cream shop. After much persisting, the shop agrees to create a recipe for vanilla ice cream. While customers are waiting, the ice cream shop makes another big announcement, they just released a new flavor! It’s galled ‘garbage can.’ The customers, who all wanted vanilla, still took the flavor with glee, as flavors don’t get released often, but soon after, the flavor is forgotten. Fast forward five months, the ice cream shop makes another announcement! Now they are re-writing their recipe for peach, a flavor nobody gets or likes. This is what is happening with the A350. For a plane this popular and this requested, I would be running to get this plane out as best I can. I wouldn’t be running to make a general aviation plane that everyone will forget about two weeks after the update, then announce that were fully reworking a plane no one wants to use or has used. There is a small percentage of those who love GA, but if comon sense tells me anything, it’s to appease the masses before you appease the little guy.
Staff Members & Other Fun
If that was not enough, it seems that staff members are getting frustrated with feature requests.
“Ever take a break from requesting things like the A350 or clouds and think…”
“Guys, i think some of you are too new to know this. But too those of you saying the community had no voice in deciding the new content”
Honestly? Who had a say in making the X-Cub DURING the production of the A350? Who had a say in the 172? No one. And that first one? Please look up what being “Passive Agressive” is, God. “Ever take a break from requesting something [that should come standard on every flight simulator]?”
Someone needs to get their head out of the (non-existent) clouds. Infinite flight maps? What?
Gear Tilt and Feature Denial
Gear tilt is something I would argue is even more important than clouds. It’s such an easy fix. God. Instead of working on the 172 and restricting play on casual servers, maybe, just maybe, add a super easy fix that everyone would appreciate. Honestly, infinite flight is getting an Apple mentality, “we don’t have to add features that are standard across every phone ever, because we’re apple, and screw off.” And for an eighty dollar game, I expect to have something as SIMPLE as gear tilt.
But 1Bitttt But 1Bittttt- developers need time to introduce things, stop being so ignorant 1Bittt
Sorry, if the developers can make the X-Cub in such a short amount of time, they can TILT the GEAR, in a day or two. God.
Some Final Words
Stop making and updating more GA planes when you have a huge update queued. Especially such an essential one. It makes zero sense. GA planes are rarely flown, and when they are it’s never regularly, it’s usually island hopping or getting landings in, or just some Grade 5 showing off how s/he can somehow land smoothly in a Daher. This is a PSA to you, infinite flight. Stop, and think. You will be turning into a privileged company that can’t get enough of themselvs that will not uphold a standard because of it, it took apple over 10 years to fix a God awful UI problem already fixed on every device out there. Don’t become apple.
I know how touchy-feely this community gets about opposing opinions, so please, please, read over your response and fully read my topic before replying. It’s probably answered within the topic. And maybe learn to start accepting others opinions instead of blindly defending developers or a popular opinion.
About to get banned