This request was heavily inspired by the post I linked above. Firstly, let me just say I know there are issues with this, but I’m sure we should be able to work it out.
Basically, it goes like this:
Pilots fly to an airport > IFATC open their > Pilots fly to an airport > IFATC open their > Pilots fly to an airport > IFATC open their [goes on Infinitely].
Here’s how it works:
Pilots like flying to massive international megahubs like London Heathrow Airport, Los Angeles Inti, John F. Kennedy Inti, etc. How many times have you seen someone talking about flying to; EGLL, KLAX, KSFO, KJFK, EHAM, KORD, EDDF?
But, one of the reasons pilots like flying there is because IFATC open there when ever it is on the schedule. But, here’s the problem, IFATC only open there because pilots go there. It was very well explained in the post above so I’m not going to repeat it. But basically, we need pilots to start flying to smaller airports, so IFATC want to open smaller airports, so pilots fly to smaller airports, and so forth.
For IFATC controllers to be able to choose to “book” a frequency for a certain time/date. Note: this is optional; IFATC do not have to do this. It is simply an option. Basically, say a controller looks at the schedule for the proceeding week on Sunday evening. They know that they’ll be available, and probably want to control, Friday at 1700Z. They would go to a website, maybe if-atc.com or ifatc.org, and go to book London Luton (EGGW( tower and ground from 1700Z-1800Z. I’m not to sure how exactly the process would work, but basically it would be choosing the airport, frequency(ies), start time, end time.
Right, so as a pilot, if you want to plan to have ATC, as many seem to do, do you spend time going “well, ATC are at this small airport now… but will they be there in 10-30 mins once I have gotten ready to take off / 1-2 hours once I arrive from my dep airport”? Yeah, me too. So, in app, if you as a pilot could see all the bookings, then there will be a greater chance that IFATC will be there still be there / will have opened by the time you arrive/depart.
Say I am planning a flight, I want to fly from the US to the UK. Ok, obviously there are lots of airport pairs, but let’s just say I have two options for simplicity.
This is the ATC scheduled airports
London Heathrow* (EGLL), New York* (KJFK(, Edinburgh (EGPH), Orlando (KMCO).
Option 1: EGLL-KJFK
I have ATC the whole flight.
Option 2: EGPH-KMCO
At the minute, I would have no ATC. I just wouldn’t. Both of these airports are relatively small - yes, I know they are large, but relatively speaking, they’re not. That means that less pilots will fly there, meaning IFATC are going to be battling to get a position at EGLL or KJFK to get some good traffic to work. Two people loose out in this situation
- Any pilots like me trying to fly from EGPH-KMCO with ATC but not getting it
- ATC who kinda wanna open either EGPH or KMCO, but as they will get little traffic, they feel bored and try and open larger airports.
With my request, ATC could have booked to be open at EGPH, so more pilots will be inclined to fly there, meaning both pilots and the controllers get to have fun. Another massive ongoing issue this will resolve is all the traffic flocking to the hub, creating unrealistic traffic flow. Hey, all you Realism Police at places like Dublin, IFATC could use one runway like IRL as there would be less stress on the airport with 160+ 777s! We might to see fewers disasters like Tahiti.
Fine. Just find an available frequency and open. No fuss
Oh well, it’s like an event, sometimes people have stuff IRL. I think we can trust IFATC enough though that they’ll book when they know they can, or likely can, and just fly or open an available frequency when they are unsure.
I tried to make this as short as possible without making it too short. I did start to ramble with the EGPH KMCO example, but I hope you all got the point.
Here, I will address all of you concerns or questions.
Thanks for checking out this request! If you want to see this fearure, why not leave it a vote?