This is only an aircraft request, and Comparison, not a livery request. this is also a comparison between this aircraft an the smaller shorter range 350. Pro and cons of the two are shown below
The Bombardier Challenger 650 is a larger, more capable aircraft than the Challenger 350, offering a wider cabin, higher passenger capacity, and greater range, while the Challenger 350 is a super-midsize jet known for its speed and
efficiency.
Here’s a more detailed comparison:
Challenger 650:
- Size and Capacity:
The Challenger 650 boasts the widest-in-class cabin, accommodating up to 12 passengers.
- Range:
It has a longer range than the Challenger 350, allowing for longer flights.
- Performance:
The Challenger 650 is powered by General Electric CF34-3B MTO engines, offering a higher thrust rate and improved takeoff performance.
-
Size and Capacity: The Challenger 350/3500 is a super-midsize jet with a cabin that can accommodate up to 10 passengers.
-
Range: It has a shorter range than the Challenger 650.
-
Performance: The Challenger 350/3500 is powered by Honeywell HTF7350 engines, offering a high-speed cruise of 540mph/870kph/Mach 0.82.
-
Price: A new Challenger 3500 costs around $26.7 million.
Here’s a table summarizing the key differences:
| Feature | Challenger 650 | Challenger 350/3500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cabin Width | Widest in class | — |
| Passenger Capacity | Up to 12 | Up to 10 |
| Range | Longer | Shorter |
| Engines | General Electric CF34-3B MTO | Honeywell HTF7350 |
In summary, one of multiple other reasons this aircraft should be incorporated into IF is because it will be added to our phase out the smaller, less nimble, shorter range CL35 aircraft. This also bridges the gap between private jet aviation and commercial aviation as the CRJ series of aircraft are just a hyper extended version of the 650, Further giving way to the fact that the 650 has an increased range because of the same engines on the CRJ series.
Credit to Jetphotos