I didn’t even know this aircraft existed until now 😂
I’ll add that to the operators list
None of us ever said that, and that is why this argument is flawed.
Thank you @dca.iad.aviation!
But, there are more operators of the A319LR (Air China, Sichuan, Air Cote D’ivoire…)
Idk if we need this
It’d be a nice addition in the near future. I feel kinda dumb, I didn’t even know this A/C existed 😂
4500nm compared to the 3670 of the normal one, impressive, I’ll see if I could possibly clear a vote!
Edit: voted :))
It’s the difference between London to Beijing and London to Delhi… imagine doing that 10:30 flight on a small narrowbody!!
Voted, because this is my favorite aircraft by a thousand miles…
Also because a feature asks for votes, no “don’ts”!
It’s not offending them 🤦♂️. We are saying this is not our priorities at the moment. And I hate to say it, there’s no point of adding the LR edition because we already have an A319.
Well, I think that is a great idea doing long hauls with a narrow body jet.
Got my support :)
I didnt really offend you but we could upgrade the A319 (in infinite flight) to the LR range
I hate to be “that guy”, but I’ll drop a vote on this. I’d like to see more single-aisle long(erish) range aircraft to the game.
That makes no sense, that’s like saying there’s no point of adding the A320neo because we already have the A320 family
I see if I can clear up a vote for this.
@dca.iad.aviation, I recommend to vote for your own request.
Not really. You can manage to do a long flight on the A319, for example a trans-Atlantic flight like JFK-CDG. My friend managed to do this on the A319 buddy.
I think that the point that everyone is missing is that this would require no change to the aircraft model or physics, it would just be expanding the amount of fuel you can load. That’s a simple change, no different than the 73G vs BBJ1.
I have actually done that lobgest A319 route once with Privat’s low load (cuz all business) and I had more than enoguh fuel left.