I was wondering if anybody knows if the developers of the 777LR used the same engines at the 777-300ER? I want to know if it has the thrust of the GE90-110B1L or the GE90-115BL? I know the difference shouldnt be alot but im curious about the specifics.
2 Likes
Actually, there is a specific difference in the sim. The 777-300ER is powered by the GE90-115BL (approx. 115k lbs thrust), while the 777-200LR is modeled with the GE90-110B1L (approx. 110k lbs thrust). So, the LR has slightly less thrust rating compared to the 300ER, matching the standard real-world configuration.
4 Likes
Not sure if this thread helps you:
im using n1 figures from the fcom and simbreif performance data for takeoff thrust, so i have a more accurate takeoff roll than with those estimates
is this accurate? thank you sm for this information.
it looks like the LR in sim has the same mtow as the variant with ge90-115 engines maybe? is that correct? im looking at the 777 typical arrangment document from boeing, idk if that is relevant.
1 Like
That document is definitely relevant! You are on the right track. In the sim, the 777-200LR is modeled with its maximum structural MTOW (approx. 347,500 kg / 766,000 lbs) to enable those ultra-long-haul routes.
Even though the menu lists the 110B1 engine, the aircraft physics allow for that high-weight performance. However, the 777-300ER still has a slightly higher MTOW (approx. 351,500 kg) compared to the LR
may I ask where i can find this menu with the engine variant?
1 Like
While the specific engine model text isn’t explicitly displayed on the EICAS or menu currently, the Weight & Balance screen confirms the answer.
It lists the MTOW as 347,500 kg, which matches the real-world 777-200LR specs exactly. Since the 777-300ER has a higher MTOW (approx. 351,500 kg), this confirms the LR is modeled with its own distinct physics and likely the correct 110k thrust rating, rather than just copying the 300ER’s stats.
but if it has the highest mtow, then wouldn’t it maybe be fitted with the -300’s ge90-115s?
777_passenger.pdf https://share.google/vm3q3OYwSvWWqVPyu
That is actually a spot-on observation! Looking closely at the chart you shared, the ‘Maximum’ column (which matches the IF weight of 347,450 kg) is indeed paired with the GE90-115BL.
So you are logically correct: since Infinite Flight models the aircraft at that specific max weight capacity, it is almost certainly simulating the thrust performance of the 115BL to get it off the ground, effectively making it the same power rating as the -300ER engines, even if the label in the menu might say otherwise. Great catch!
I cannot find any label in the menu that says anything about the engine variant of the planes, do you have a screenshot?
1 Like
I just double-checked the current app version, and you are right—the specific engine variant text seems to be absent from the menu descriptions in the new UI, so I can’t provide a screenshot of that specific label right now.
However, the deduction you made using the Weight & Balance screen is actually the ultimate proof. Since the sim physics allow for the 347,450 kg MTOW, it is definitely simulating the ‘Maximum’ variant from your Boeing chart, which corresponds to the GE90-115BL. The physics speak louder than the menu text!
1 Like
This topic was automatically closed 90 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.