I’m sorry but that’s not hate mail/comments it’s just saying that these airlines are rarely used my friend.[quote=“Sumith_M, post:2, topic:16846, full:true”]
I don’t think that just because airlines aren’t used they should be removed. I’ve seen those used before, and I myself have used a couple of them. I’m all for adding additional liveries. But first let’s get old planes up-to-date (787, A321) then worry about the 737, since its update was pretty comprehensive… JAL is great for Kuala Lampur, Jet2 for London/France/Amsterdam, and so is Thomson. Since there isn’t a middle eastern region yet, El Al wouldn’t be used too much but doesn’t mean it should be removed.
Edit: JAL 737 wouldn’t be able to make that flight between Tokyo and Kuala Lumpur, so actually only the JAL 777 would be in that region. Until there is a Hong Kong or Japan region the JAL 737 wouldn’t be used too much…
Rock why this discussion has come about is answered above by Patrick. As said the 737 will soon be getting the APPR system and apparently some new livery arrangements!
No-one here is a dev, so who knows what happens when? I think the rumor is APPR might be rolled out to all aircraft. That’s fine, and livery updates are fine. I’m just saying no liveries should be removed…
Things aeen’t removed just because you don’t like it. Not sure how this plays out in a world where you rule as king, but in reality, unless a majority can prove your point on removing ___ Airlines’ livery, then the world wn’t chang just for you. Least that’s how the world has worked in my lifetime
There’s zero point in removing liveries that are perfectly fine. Even if they don’t get used as often as the others, what’s the point in getting rid of them??